Message-ID: <4is9sd$30n@nntp4.u.washington.edu>
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UU tindrum.tng.oche.de [DUUCP BETA vom 15.03.1996], RFC1036/822 KY key.GUN.de [DUUCP BETA vom 06.01.1995]
References: <4ii5pf$dbc@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <4ij2hn$ecc@nntp4.u.washington.edu> <4iqhl8$1dr@bud.peinet.pe.ca>
From: scythe@u.washington.edu (Dan Shiovitz)
Subject: Re: Contest '96 -- Rule Clarification?
Date: 21 Mar 1996 19:15:25 +0000
Path: nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.tng.oche.de!tindrum.tng.oche.de!key.gun.de!news2.gtn.com!news.gtn.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!news.u.washington.edu!scythe!scythe
Newsgroups: rec.games.int-fiction
Distribution: world
Lines: 25

In article <4iqhl8$1dr@bud.peinet.pe.ca>,
Trevor Barrie <tbarrie@cycor.ca> wrote:
>scythe@u.washington.edu (Dan Shiovitz) wrote:
>
>>[I am, of course, not a judge, these opinions are not those of GKW, Gareth
>>Rees, or Lyndon LaRouche*, etc]
>
>>* To list off three people who may or may not be the judges of the second 
>>annual i-f contest.
>
>Wait a minute... I thought we were _all_ judges. Isn't this going to
>be a people's choice-type thing, like the first one?
I b'lieve what I meant was a judge in the sense of the people determining the
rules of the contest, rather than a judge as someone who judges the entries,
because you are in fact totally correct about that.

--
dan shiovitz scythe@u.washington.edu shiov@cs.washington.edu
slightly lost author/programmer in a world of more creative or more sensible
people ... remember to speak up for freedom because no one else will do it
for you: use it or lose it ... carpe diem -- be proactive.
my web site: http://weber.u.washington.edu/~scythe/home.html some ok stuff.



